At a time of
dipression fiscal policy accelerates economic activity and increases employment
and output without effecting price level significantly. It was actually
happened after Great Depression and during world war-II in many countries. For
example in USA, public sector promoted from 10 to 45% of GNP, output rose by
50%, unemplyment rate became negligible, and the inflation was quite low. This
phenomenon continued up to late sixties when excessive government expenditures
to finance Vietnam war set inflationary pressure in the economy. Inflation
being a dynamic process perpetuated itself through wage-price-wage spiral.
Finally it resulted at stagflation experienced in 1973.
The appropriate
policy to get rid of inflation is to increase taxes or cut down govt.
expenditures or decrease money supply or a mix of them. It may, however,
generate cost-push inflation and unemployment. So tax penalties (irregular
taxes) and bugets cuts from non-developmental expenditures are better policy
tools in an inflationary period.
The fiscal system was
originated to control aggregate but, somehow, it also influences factor markets
and capacity output. Any increase in personal taxes may effect the work leisure
battitude of the individuals depending taxes usually eat up savings and thus
reduce capital formating. Discriminatory tax policy may encourage expenditures
on health, education, research and training etc. which improve the quality of
labour and pave the way of technological progress.
The difference
between tax revenue and pure consumption expenditures is called public savings
which can be utilized, partially or fully, for capital formation. A fall in tax
revenue maintaining the sme level of current expenditures spares less funds for
public investment.
No comments:
Post a Comment